Speak with an adviser 678.821.3508

"Report
Uncategorized

Report Details 3 Trends Driving Employers’ Health Care Costs

Pharmacy spending, high-cost claimants and newly developed anti-obesity drugs are expected to shape health benefits and affect the cost of care and health insurance for employers, according to a new report.

The “2024 Employee Health Trends” report by Springbuk, an online health intelligence platform, reflects concerns among employers and insurers about runaway drug costs due to increasingly expensive medications and new diabetes and anti-obesity drugs.

Also, the report looks at the effects of high-cost health plan enrollees, those who are high health care users either due to a chronic condition, cancer or an accident or illness that requires ongoing care.

One such employee enrolled in one of your group health insurance plans can result in massive costs that overshadow those of the rest of your workforce if you are a small or mid-sized employer.

High-cost claimants

According to Springbuk’s research:

  • One out of every 1,000 health plan enrollees is likely to account for total paid claims of $340,000.
  • Five out of every 1,000 members are likely to have total paid claims of over $140,000.
  • About one in five members in each high-cost category was in the same category in the previous year.

Common high-cost claim conditions include:

  • Various cancers
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Heart disease
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Sepsis
  • Joint degeneration
  • Chronic renal failure
  • Psoriasis
  • Adult rheumatoid arthritis
  • Inflammatory bowel disease.

Springbuk’s report recommends the following:

  • Understand the population at greatest risk of becoming high-cost claimants based on conditions, history of being a high-cost claimant and demographic information.
  • To reduce surgical costs, the health plan can push for expert/second opinions, partner with a center of excellence, engage in payment-bundling arrangements, and pursue risk reduction.
  • Employ risk-reduction programs like weight-loss programs to lower the risk of surgery for degenerative arthritis.
  • Use preauthorization, step therapy and incentives to promote the use of biosimilars to reduce the costs of specialty drugs.
  • Use price transparency tools to determine which facilities are less costly, but make sure to consider the quality of care.

Pharmacy spending

Between 2020 and 2023, the average per member per month pharmacy spend increased 38% from $86 to $119. Two of the biggest contributors to the rapidly rising drug spending are specialty drugs and brand-name medications used in the treatment of chronic conditions.

According to the report, the top 10 conditions contributing to health plan drug spending are:

  • Diabetes
  • Psoriasis
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Adult rheumatoid arthritis
  • Asthma
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Obesity
  • Other inflammation of the skin
  • Migraine headache
  • Attention deficit disorder.

Since the majority of drug spending is related to chronic conditions, strategies focused on their main causes can help rein in spending. These include:

  • Healthy diet and lifestyle coaching,
  • Weight-loss courses and counseling,
  • Free gym memberships and other programs that emphasize the importance of exercise, and
  • Smoking cessation services.

Other recommendations:

  • Target brand-name drugs and specialty drugs in your cost-containment strategies.
  • Take steps to ensure members taking specialty and high-cost brand-name drugs are using generic formulations and biosimilars where available, provided the net cost is lower.
  • Understand the PBM contract.
  • Consider whether engaging with a clinical program partner that focuses on pharmacy savings opportunities would be cost-effective.
  • Medications or bariatric surgery may be considered for members who are not able to achieve or sustain weight loss.

One thing to consider about these medications is that they are helping your employees control their conditions and preventing complications or progression of the illness, thereby reducing other health care costs.

Obesity

More than 41% of Americans are considered clinically obese, defined as having a body mass index of 30 or more. Obesity is linked to a number of health conditions, which are all costly to treat, including diabetes, gastrointestinal disorders, heart disease, cancer and musculoskeletal disorders.

Enter highly expensive GLP-1 drugs, originally designed to treat diabetes, with one of their main side effects being that those who take them eat less and shed weight. As a result, demand for these pharmaceuticals has boomed, but not all health plans cover them.

Overall plan outlays for treating obesity jumped 40% in 2023 from the year prior, driven largely by an eye-popping 138% explosion in drug spending.

You can take steps to reduce these outlays for treating obesity by using step therapy, which entails first starting a program that is focused on diet, exercise and behavioral modifications. If those efforts fail, traditional weight-loss medications may be considered before moving to GLP-1 drugs or bariatric surgery.

Consider partnering with a clinical program that addresses obesity.

""/
Uncategorized

Besides Health Insurance and 401(k)s, These Are the Benefits Employees Value Most

Besides health insurance and a 401(k) plan, other benefits that employees value highly are generous paid time off and flexible or remote work, according to a new survey.

But for the first time, the annual study by employee benefits provider Unum found that the younger generations are not on the same page with their older peers when it comes to what they value most in their benefits package.

“A multi-generational workforce is a huge benefit for companies,” said Liz Ahmed, executive vice president of People and Communications at Unum. “With the diversity of background, experiences, and thought employees bring, employers need to make sure there’s something in their benefits package for everyone’s different stage of life.”

Although the generations differ in their top three priorities, when opened to the top five, there is one common denominator: emergency savings.

Emergency savings

Sixty-four percent of employees surveyed said they do not have access to an emergency savings option through their employer. This benefit ranks third for boomers (25%), third for Gen X (32%) and second for Gen Z (37%).

Emergency savings plans can help prepare your employees for unexpected expenses — without dipping into retirement funds or using credit cards.

Employer-sponsored emergency savings accounts help workers save for financial emergencies by automatically deducting an amount from each paycheck and depositing it into a separate account. If they need to cover a bill or cash gets tight, they can draw from this fund to bridge a financial gap.

Also, with mental health support and resources high on the list for younger workers, employers may consider tapping an employee assistance program. EAPs are voluntary, work-based programs that offer free and confidential assessments, short-term counseling, referrals and follow-up services to employees who have personal and/or work-related problems.

You can use the following list as a general guidepost if you are considering adding voluntary benefits to your employee offerings.

These are the top 15 non-insurance benefits for U.S. workers:

  • Generous paid time off program
  • Flexible/remote work options
  • Paid family leave (for childcare or caring for an adult family member)
  • Mental health resources/support
  • Emergency savings
  • Professional development
  • Financial planning resources
  • Fitness or healthy-lifestyle incentives
  • ID theft prevention
  • Gym membership or onsite fitness center
  • Student loan repayment benefits
  • Pet-friendly offices
  • Personalized health coaching
  • Sabbatical leave
  • Dedicated volunteer hours.

A final thought

There are so many voluntary benefits to choose from that it’s important that you opt for ones that your employees actually want. A good way to gauge their interest is to conduct your own survey by asking them which benefits they would like to see and offering them a list to choose from.

"office
Healthcare

Concerns Rise Over Letting Employers Fund HRAs for Individual Health Plans

Employers, health insurers, regulators and hospitals are all raising concerns about the Trump administration’s rules issued last year that allow employers to fund health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) that their workers can use to purchase health plans on the open market.

The Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, IRS and the Department of Labor issued the final rules in late 2019. They reverse one of the major pinch-points of the Affordable Care Act, which bars employers from paying employees to buy their own health insurance either on publicly run health insurance exchanges or on the open market.

The fine for breaching this part of the law is a hefty $36,500 annually.

The rules continue to receive pushback from small business groups, insurers, regulators and others, who say that employers who want to go this route are facing a bureaucratic nightmare.

And one of the biggest concerns is that employers will use the opportunity to move older and sicker workers from their group health plans to exchanges, in order to reduce the cost burden on their plans.

Complexity a major issue

The National Federation of Independent Business has said that small businesses that want to offer workers an HRA integrated with an individual-market health plan are facing a lot of complexity.

“NFIB recommends that your departments plan to release… a publication that explains in plain English, step-by-step, how small businesses can establish, administer, and comply with the rules,” the group wrote.

HRAs are tax-sheltered accounts funded employers that typically are offered to reimburse employees for out-of-pocket medical expenses. This rule expands how those HRAs can be used. HRAs have been tax-advantaged only if they are coupled with an ACA-compliant group health plan. They cannot be used now to pay premiums for individual-market health insurance.

Under the rule, employers could provide an HRA that is integrated with individual health insurance coverage. The rule does include provisions to prevent employers from steering workers or dependents with costly health conditions away from the employer group plan and toward individual coverage.

Employers also could offer a different type of HRA, funded up to $1,800 a year, that could be used by employees to pay premiums for short-term plans that don’t comply with ACA consumer protections.

Employers could not offer the same employees the choice of either a traditional group plan or an HRA-funded individual-market plan. But they could offer a group plan to certain classes of employees, such as full-time workers under age 25, and an HRA plan to other classes, such as part-time employees.

Fears many may be shunted from group plans

Other concerns that are being raised include those by the American Academy of Actuaries that self-insured employers, in particular, may use the rule to shunt less healthy employees out of their group health plans, which in turn could result in worsening the ACA individual-market risk pool.

The Federation of American Hospitals expressed concern that the proposal would shift people out of the employer group market into the less stable individual market, which offers thinner benefits and less support for consumers.

The conservative National Federation of Independent Business supports the new rule but is concerned that it will be a complex process to set this type of arrangement up, especially for small businesses.

The liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said the proposal to let a special type of HRA be used to buy short-term plans could be challenged legally, because the ACA and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) prohibit group plans from discriminating based on health status, as short-term plans are allowed to do.

""/
Industry News

40 States Sue Generic Drug Makers for Collusion

The heat is growing on the pharmaceutical industry after more than 40 US states filed a lawsuit accusing generic drug makers of engaging in a massive price-fixing scheme.

The lawsuit accuses 20 companies of conspiring to fix prices of more than 100 generic drugs, including some that are used to treat cancer and diabetes. The defendants include the largest producer of generic medicine in the world: Teva Pharmaceuticals.